Canonical Typology

Canonical Typology bibliography

Publications on Canonical Typology are increasing steadily. The list of publications and preprints available here show that Canonical Typology has progressed from its origins in morphology and syntax to cover a much greater range, including phonology and sign language.

Please do send new items, and any items which have been inadvertently omitted (for which I apologise), to: g.corbett@surrey.ac.uk

Bibliography

Baerman, Matthew & Greville G. Corbett. 2012. Stem alternations and multiple exponence. Word Structure 5, 1: 52-68. doi: 10.3366/word.2012.0019

Baerman, Matthew, Dunstan Brown & Greville G. Corbett. 2005. The syntax-morphology interface: A study of syncretism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [especially pages 27-35] Publisher's site

Bond, Oliver. 2013. A base for canonical negation. In Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax, 20-47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Brown, Dunstan & Marina Chumakina. 2013. What there is and what there might be: An introduction to Canonical Typology. In Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax, 1-19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Brown, Dunstan, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds). 2013. Canonical morphology and syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Publisher's site

Camilleri, Maris & Phyllisienne Gauci. 2014. Syncretism and its effects within Maltese nominal paradigms. Folio Linguistica 47, 2: 323-343. doi: 10.1515/flin.2013.013

Cappellaro, Chiara. 2013. Overabundance in diachrony: A case study. In Silvio Cruschina, Martin Maiden & John Charles Smith (eds.), The boundaries of pure morphology: Diachronic and synchronic perspectives, 209-220. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chumakina, Marina. 2011. Nominal periphrasis: A canonical approach. Studies in Language 35, 2: 247-274. doi: 10.1075/sl.35.2.01chu Download PDF

Comrie, Bernard. 2003. When agreement gets trigger-happy. In Dunstan Brown, Greville Corbett & Carole Tiberius (eds.) Agreement: A typological perspective. Special issue of Transactions of the Philological Society 101, 2: 313-37.

Corbett, Greville G. 2003a. Agreement: Canonical instances and the extent of the phenomenon. In Geert Booij, Janet DeCesaris, Angela Ralli & Sergio Scalise (eds.), Topics in morphology: Selected papers from the Third Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (Barcelona, September 20-22, 2001), 109-128. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Download PDF

Corbett, Greville G. 2003b. Agreement: The range of the phenomenon and the principles of the Surrey Database of Agreement. In Dunstan Brown, Greville G. Corbett & Carole Tiberius (eds.), Agreement: A typological perspective. Special issue of Transactions of the Philological Society 101, 2: 155-202. Download PDF

Corbett, Greville G. 2005. The canonical approach in typology. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges & David S. Rood (eds.), Linguistic diversity and language theories (Studies in Language Companion Series 72), 25-49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Download PDF

Corbett, Greville G. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Publisher's site

Corbett, Greville G. 2007. Canonical typology, suppletion and possible words. Language 83, 1: 8-42 Download PDF

Corbett, Greville G. 2008. Determining morphosyntactic feature values: The case of case. In Greville G. Corbett & Michael Noonan (eds.), Case and grammatical relations: Papers in honour of Bernard Comrie, 1-34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Download PDF

Corbett, Greville G. 2009. Canonical Inflectional Classes. In Fabio Montermini, Gilles Boyé & Jesse Tseng (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 6th Décembrettes, 1-11. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. Download PDF

Corbett, Greville G. 2011. Higher order exceptionality in inflectional morphology. In Horst J. Simon & Heike Wiese (eds.), Expecting the unexpected: Exceptions in grammar, 107-126. Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter.

Corbett, Greville G. 2012. Canonical morphosyntactic features. In Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax, 48-65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Corbett, Greville G. & Sebastian Fedden. Two systems or one? A Canonical Typology approach. 2015. Paper presented at the conference 'Diversity linguistics: retrospect and prospect', Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, 1-3 May 2015. Download PDF

Cormier, Kearsy, Adam Schembri & Bencie Woll. 2013. Pronouns and pointing in sign languages. Lingua 137: 230-247.

Cysouw, Michael. 2011. Very atypical agreement indeed. Theoretical Linguistics 37: 153-160.

Evans, Nicholas. 2003. Typologies of agreement: some problems from Kayardild. In Dunstan Brown, Greville G. Corbett & Carole Tiberius (eds.) Agreement: A typological perspective. Special issue of Transactions of the Philological Society 101, 2: 203-34.

Evans, Nicholas. 2013. Some problems in the typology of quotation: A canonical approach. In Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax, 66-98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Everaert, Martin. 2013. The criteria for reflexivization. In Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax, 190-206. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Farrar, Scott. 2013. An ontological approach to Canonical Typology: Laying the foundations for e-Linguistics. In Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds), Canonical morphology and syntax, 239-261. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Forker, Diana 2014. A canonical approach to the argument/adjunct distinction. Linguistic discovery 12, 2: 27-40. doi: 10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.444 

Fortin, Antonio. 2011. The morphology and semantics of expressive affixes. DPhil thesis: University of Oxford.

van Gijn, Rik & Fernando Zúñiga. 2014. Word and the Americanist perspective. Morphology 24, 135-160. doi: 10.1007/s11525-014-9242-z

Hyman, Larry M. 2009. How (not) to do phonological typology: The case of pitch-accent. In Michael J. Kenstowicz (ed.), Data and theory: Papers in phonology in celebration of Charles W. Kisseberth. Special issue of Language Sciences 31, 2-3: 213-128. Download PDF

Hyman, Larry M. 2011. In defense of Prosodic Typology: A Response to Beckman & Venditti. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report (2011), 200-235. [Published as Hyman (2012)] Download PDF

Hyman, Larry M. 2012. In defense of Prosodic Typology: A Response to Beckman & Venditti. Linguistic Typology 16, 3: 341-385.

Kwon, Nahyun & Erich R. Round. 2015. Phonaesthemes in morphological theory. Morphology 25, 1-27. doi: 10.1007/s11525-014-9250-z

Luraghi, Silvia. Forthcoming. From non-canonical to canonical agreement. Paper presented at the workshop 'Agreement from a Diachronic Perspective', Marburg. 4-6 October 2012.. To appear in a Festschrift, published by Widmaier (Hamburg). PDF

Michael, Lev. 2014. The Nanti reality status system: Implications for the typological validity of the realis/irrealis contrast. Linguistic Typology 18, 2: 251-288. doi: 10.1515/lingty-2014-0011 Download PDF

Mörth, Karlheinz and Wolfgang U. Dressler. 2014. German plural doublets with and without meaning differentiation. In Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Hans Christian Luschützky and Wolfgang U. Dressler (eds.), Morphology and meaning: Selected papers from the 15th International Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2012 (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 327), 249-258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Nikolaeva, Irina. 2013. Unpacking finiteness. In Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds.) Canonical morphology and syntax, 99-122. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nikolaeva, Irina & Andrew Spencer. 2008. Nouns as Adjectives and Adjectives as Nouns. Ms. SOAS and University of Essex. Download PDF

Nikolaeva, Irina & Andrew Spencer. 2013. Possession and modification – a perspective from Canonical Typology. In Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax, 207-238. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Paciaroni, Tania. 2012. Noun inflection classes in Maceratese. In Sascha Gaglia & Marc-Olivier Hinzelin (eds.), Inflection and word formation in Romance languages, 231-270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Download PDF

Palancar, Enrique L. 2012. The conjugation classes of Tilapa Otomi: An approach from canonical typology. Linguistics 50, 4: 783-832. doi: 10.1515/ling-2012-0025  Download PDF

Palancar, Enrique L. 2015. A mixed system of agreement in the suffix classes of Lealao Chinantec. Morphology 25, 29–62. doi: 10.1007/s11525-014-9252-x

Polinsky, Maria. 2003. Non-canonical agreement is canonical. In Dunstan Brown, Greville G. Corbett & Carole Tiberius (eds.) Agreement: A typological perspective. Special issue of Transactions of the Philological Society 101, 2: 279-312.

Sagot, Benoît & Géraldine Walther. 2011. Non-Canonical infection: Data, formalisation and complexity measures. In C. Mahlow & M. Piotrowski (eds.), SFCM 2011: Communications in Computer and Information Science, Vol. 100, 23-45. Berlin: Springer. Download PDF.

Santilli, Enzo. 2014. Italian comparatives: A case of overabundance? BA thesis: University of L’Aquila. [Available at: http://univaq.academia.edu/EnzoSantilli/Papers]

Seifart, Frank. 2005. The structure and use of shape-based noun classes in Mira–a ( North West Amazon). PhD thesis: Radboud University, Nijmegen.

Siewierska, Anna & Dik Bakker. 2013. Passive agents: Prototypical vs. canonical passives. In Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax, 151-189. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Spencer, Andrew. 2005. Extending deponency. In Matthew Baerman, Greville G. Corbett, Dunstan Brown & Andrew Hippisley (eds.), Deponency and morphological mismatches (Proceedings of the British Academy 145), 45-70. Oxford: British Academy and Oxford University Press.

Spencer, Andrew & Ana Luís. 2013. The canonical clitic. In Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax, 123-150. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stump, Gregory T. 2005. A non-canonical pattern of deponency and its implications. In Matthew Baerman, Greville G. Corbett, Dunstan Brown & Andrew Hippisley (eds.), Deponency and morphological mismatches (Proceedings of the British Academy 145), 71-95. Oxford: British Academy and Oxford University Press.

Stump, Gregory T. 2006. Heteroclisis and paradigm linkage. Language 82, 2: 279-322. doi: 10.1353/lan.2006.0110

Stump, Gregory T. 2012. The formal and functional architecture of inflectional morphology. In Angela Ralli, Geert Booij, Sergio Scalise & Athanasios Karasimos (eds.), Morphology and the architecture of grammar: On-line Proceedings of the 8th Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM8), Cagliari, Italy, 14-17 September 2011, 255-271. Available at: http://www3.lingue.unibo.it/mmm2/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/MMM8_Cagliari_Proceedings.pdf

Stump, Gregory T. & Raphael Finkel. 2008. Stem alternations and principal parts in French verb inflection. Paper presented at the conference 'Décembrettes 6: Colloque International de Morphologie, « Morphologie et classes flexionnelles »', December 4-5, 2008, Université de Bordeaux, France.

Suthar, Babubhai Kohyabhai. 2006. Agreement in Gujarati. PhD Dissertation: University of Pennsylvania. Abstract

Thornton, Anna M. 2011. Overabundance (multiple forms realizing the same cell): A non-canonical phenomenon in Italian verb morphology. In Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith, Maria Goldbach & Marc-Olivier Hinzelin (eds.), Morphological autonomy: Perspectives from Romance inflectional morphology, 358-381. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Download PDF

Thornton, Anna M. 2010-2011. La non canonicitˆ del tipo It. braccio // braccia / bracci: sovrabbondanza, difettivitˆ o iperdifferenziazione? Studi di grammatical italiana 29-30: 419-477. Download PDF

Van de Velde, Mark. 2013. The Bantu connective construction. In Anne Carlier and Jean-Christophe Verstraete (eds.), The genitive (Case and Grammatical Relations across Languages, 5), 217-252. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Download PDF

TOP
close